TY - CONF TI - Institutional Waste within the Construction Industry - An Outline AU - Sarhan, Saad AU - Pasquire, Christine AU - King, Andrew AD - PhD Student, MSc Civil Engineer, Centre for Lean Projects, School of Architecture Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom, Nottingham NG1 4BU, Tel: +44 (0)7961757059, sarhan_com@hotmail.com or saad.sarhan2012@my.ntu.ac.uk AD - Professor of Lean Project Management, Head of the Centre for Lean Projects, School of Architecture Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4BU, Tel: +44 (0)115 848 2095, christine.pasquire@ntu.ac.uk AD - PhD, Programme Leader for MSc Quantity Surveying, Centre for Lean Projects, School of Architecture Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4BU, Tel: +44 (0)115 848 2511, andrew.king@ntu.ac.uk ED - Kalsaas, Bo Terje ED - Koskela, Lauri ED - Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu PY - 2014 DA - 2014/06/25 T2 - 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction C3 - 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction CY - Oslo, Norway SP - 895 EP - 906 SN - 2309-0979 (ISSN) AB - Waste, as understood in Lean thinking, does not feature in modern construction economics or management theory. These approaches fail to recognise the imperfect systems in which entities not only operate inefficiently, but additionally protect themselves by adding contingency and behaving opportunistically. The effect of these practices is to embed inefficient and wasteful processes across the supply chain and throughout the project life cycle. Consequently they have become part of the institution of the construction industry – ‘the way it does business’. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of waste in construction and shed light on a number of regulations, norms and routines, which are taken for granted and impede efficiency and improvement efforts in construction. It starts by critically discussing a number of imperfect systems and structures that support wasteful activities in construction. Next, the background of the institutional theory is introduced, which interestingly is not well established in construction management literature. We then demonstrate how the neo-institutional theory, a branch of organizational sociology, has the potential to be used as an analytical lens to deliver a more explicit theory of waste relating cause and effect within the wider aspects of construction systems and relationships. Finally, an outline of the concept of ‘institutional waste in construction’ is defined, and five tentative guiding hypotheses are specified for future empirical examination. KW - Waste KW - Institutional theory KW - Taken for granted KW - Systems KW - Structures KW - Norms KW - Culture L1 - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/1032/pdf UR - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/1032 DB - IGLC.net LA - English N1 - Export date: 04 October 2026 ER -