TY  - CONF
TI  - Comparing Three Methods in the Tendering Procedure to Select the Project Team
AU  - Schöttle, Annett
AU  - Arroyo, Paz
AU  - Bade, Michael
AD  - 1 PhD Candidate. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Technol. and Mgmt. in Construction (TMB), Am Fasanengarten, Geb. 50.31, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.Phone +49 721608-42168, annett.schoettle@kit.edu. Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Gehbauer, M.S.
AD  - Assistant Professor.Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile.Phone +5622354-4244, parroyo@ing.puc.cl.
AD  - Associate Vice Chancellor. Capital Programs & Campus Architect, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 654 Minnesota Street, San Francisco CA 94143, USA. +1 415502-6460, michael.bade@ucsf.edu.
ED  - Seppänen, Olli
ED  - González, Vicente A.
ED  - Arroyo, Paz
PY  - 2015
DA  - 2015/07/29
T2  - 23rd Annual Conference of the  International Group for Lean Construction
C3  - 23rd Annual Conference of the  International Group for Lean Construction
CY  - Perth, Australia
SP  - 267
EP  - 276
SN  - 2309-0979 (ISSN)
AB  - Normally, the selection of a project team is based on Weighting Rating Calculating (WRC) and often relies on only one factor; the cost factor. WRC is a method that allows for assessing multiple factors easily but the bidders’ differences may not be highlighted, since factors are weighted independently of the attributes. A more recent concept, which is based on WRC, is Best Value Selection (BVS). BVS is a method where the best value score is calculated as the bid price divided by the qualification score. Choosing By Advantage (CBA) is a multiple-criteria decision-making method based on advantages of alternatives. Advantages are compared in order to decide the importance of them. We argue that CBA provides further benefits for helping public clients to differentiate between bidders. A case was constructed, based on the tendering procedure of the project Mission Hall, to exemplify the differences of the three methods for bidder selection in the context of public tendering requirements. This paper presents the analysis and discusses the results of the simulated case.
KW  - Best value selection
KW  - choosing by advantage
KW  - weighting rating calculating
KW  - selection
KW  - tendering procedure
KW  - project team
L1  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/1180/pdf
UR  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/1180
DB  - IGLC.net
LA  - English
N1  - Export date: 04 October 2026
ER  -