TY  - CONF
TI  - The Relationship Between Making-Do Waste and Good Management Practices in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review
AU  - Amaral, Tatiana Gondim do
AU  - Filho, Renato Rafael Del Grosso
AU  - Pessoni, Rúbia Cristina de Souza
AU  - Barkokebas, Beda
AD  - Full Professor, Environmental and Civil Engineering Department, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil, tatianagondim@ufg.br, orcid.org/0000-0002-9746-4025
AD  - Master Student, Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil, renato.del@discente.ufg.br, orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-7129
AD  - Master Student, Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil, rubia@discente.ufg.br, orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-6820
AD  - Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, bbarkokebas@uc.cl, orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-1320
ED  - Costa, Dayana Bastos
ED  - Drevland, Frode
ED  - Florez-Perez, Laura
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/07/01
T2  - Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 32)
C3  - Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 32)
CY  - Auckland, New Zealand
SP  - 328
EP  - 340
DO  - 10.24928/2024/0122
SN  - 2789-0015 (ISSN)
AB  - The need within the construction market to increase control, performance, reduce waste and impacts on the environment is of utmost importance. In order to fully understand and contextualize the construction management process and help managers make decisions, this study aims to investigate studies through a systematic literature review which address the relationship between good management practices and losses from making-do within good construction practices. The search for articles was conducted in the Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science databases. This diagnosis revealed the good management practices presented in the literature, which can be facilitating activities or good practices that reduce losses from making-do, guarantee compliance with the minimum requirements of the complete kit or the resilience of the process. The categories of knowledge gaps were structured into: Industry 4.0 and 5.0, Big Data, Multi-criteria decision making, Discrete event simulation, Resilience and Literature review.
KW  - Making-do. Wastes
KW  - Lean construction
KW  - Reworking
KW  - Planning
L1  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/2287/pdf
UR  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/2287
DB  - IGLC.net
LA  - English
N1  - Export date: 04 October 2026
ER  -