https://doi.org/10.24928/2026/0269

Safety climate in a state-owned construction company: gap analysis and practical recommendations

Nia Dwi Handayani1, Alfina Hapsari2, Willem Luturmas3, Muhamad Abdi4 & Fafan Khoirul Fanani5

1Expert of HSE, Division of Risk Management & QHSE, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5853-0229
2Expert of HSE, Division of Infrastructure 1, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0829-586X
3Senior Manager of QHSE, Division of Risk Management & QHSE, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2747-2700
4Senior Vice President, Division of Risk Management & QHSE, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta, Indonesia, [email protected] , https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4851-1094
5Director of Risk Management & Legal, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8909-886X

Abstract

Safety is a mandatory requirement in Indonesia's construction industry. As part of continuous improvement efforts, a state-owned construction company conducted a safety climate assessment to identify implementation gaps, and formulate recommendations for improvement. This study utilizes a quantitative survey of 1,165 respondents and interprets the measured value in the NOSACQ-50 index to identify the implementation gap of the assessed company‘s safety climate. The assessment result indicates that the company‘s safety climate is in the "Good" category (mean 4.31) with strengths in formal rules and communication. However, the assessment shows that the assessed company‘s safety climate scores a lower point in the workplace condition, individual risk appreciation, and leaders‘ commitment categories, which implies a pattern of "strong formality, weak reality." The persistence of unsafe conditions (UC) despite high scores suggests that safety aspects are not yet embedded in the production system design. Procedures alone are not enough to encourage mature safety implementation. Individual awareness of safety risks in the field is also necessary, and this awareness must be actively promoted by top management.

Keywords

Safety, safety climate, lean construction.

Files

Reference

Download: BibTeX | RIS Format

Reference in APA 7th edition format:

Handayani, N. D., Hapsari, A., Luturmas, W., Abdi, M. & Fanani, F. K.. (2026). Safety climate in a state-owned construction company: gap analysis and practical recommendations. In Hamzeh, F., Poshdar, M., & Garcia-Lopez,, N. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 34) (pp. 402–413). https://doi.org/10.24928/2026/0269

Shortened reference for use in IGLC papers:

Handayani, N. D., Hapsari, A., Luturmas, W., Abdi, M. & Fanani, F. K.. (2026). Safety climate in a state-owned construction company: gap analysis and practical recommendations. IGLC34. https://doi.org/10.24928/2026/0269